Home Table of Contents

10 December 2017, Volume 1 Issue 2
    

  • Select all
    |
  • Lei Tao
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 1-30.
    No evidence has been found in existing literature that the word zhiyi (literal translation) has been used in ancient Chinese. It is also not common to see the combination of zhi and yi, which can be regarded as the abbreviation of “direct translation” — the understanding of “direct” always changes with the context. This kind of zhiyi is completely different from the translation term zhiyi we use nowadays. The modern Chinese word zhiyi (literal translation), opposite to yiyi (freetranslation), appeared no later than the beginning of the twentieth century. However, it was considered as an inadequate translation method then. Actually, zhiyi originated from Japanese. It was written in the form of Chinese character in Japanese, and could be found in many dictionaries from late Shogunate to early Meiji. Since Chinese and Japanese shared Chinese characters, zhiyi became a Chinese word easily by the way of “word loaning.” The “loaning” process was recorded in the notes left by Chinese students in Japan around the turn of the century, and the articles in Qingyi Newspaper and Xinmin Journal run by Liang Qichao in Japan.
  • Robert Moore
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 31-46.
    In 1912, the Francophile translator and novelist Zeng Pu 曾樸 published his translation of Victor Hugo’s final novel, Ninety-Three. Zeng significantly altered the text, changing the focus of several key sections, and leaving out a thirty-page chapter entirely. What seems like a disregard for Hugo’s novel is in fact the demonstration of a different perspective on the goal of translation. For Zeng Pu, translation was a reformative technology, one that worked to directly affect the readers’ hermeneutic protocols such that through the experience of the translated narrative, they were brought to read and see the world around them in a manner cognizant with the concerns of the translator. In service to that, the translator’s responsibility was to consciously alter the text such that a new, and in Zeng Pu’s case socially transformative, set of hermeneutic skills was fostered. This paper explores Zeng Pu’s overall philosophy on translated literature, both through later writings and through a close reading of several key changes made to Hugo’s text, and poses the question of how we are to study an approach to translation that does not believe in the fidelity of the source text.
  • Zhongli Yu
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 47-73.
    Relay translation is generally understood as the translation of a translated text, spoken or written, into a third language (St. André 2009, 230). It has been widely used in intercultural exchange in history. However, due to worries about greater distortion of or deviation from the ultimate source text, there has been widespread aversion to its practice. This partly explains why “very few dispassionate studies” on it have been carried out (Washbourne 2013, 609). Moreover, the existing studies pay more attention to problems in relay translation and tend to be very restrictive in defining the concept, either wittingly or unwittingly, excluding intralingual and intersemiotic translation. This paper investigates an intralingual case of relay translation through examining the Chinese productions at Fudan University of the radical feminist play The Vagina Monologues (Ensler 1998). However, this paper is not so much about relay translation as it is commonly understood. It explores the translation of a translated text into different translations of the text in the source language, focusing on the translators’ behavior in the specific social context, particularly the strategies for dealing with the constraints from the social context and cultural differences. The constraints resulted in remarkable manipulations in the Fudan productions for more effective communication with the audience and for better reception in the target context. The manipulations discussed under the rubric of relevance will demonstrate both differences and interconnections among the Fudan productions, the mediating texts, and the source text, revealing the complexity of translating Western feminism in China as well as the complexity of relay translation.
  • Qiang Zhang
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 75-98.
    This paper focuses on the creation of the image of cities in W. H. Auden’s poetry and how these images relate to Chinese poetry in the 1940s when used archetypally. Mu Dan’s poetry is the primary example. The construction of cities in Auden’s poems is based on two-dimensional hierarchies, namely, the disparity between ancient Western cities in their heroic glory and modern Western cities in their moral degeneration, as well as the sharp binary opposition between Western cities of colonial powers and the marginalized cities of the Orient. In the context of national salvation in 1940s China, this paper sees the description of cities in Chinese poems, especially those by the Nine Leaves School, as more than a rewriting and translation of Auden’s poems. The hybridity both in form and in content, on the one hand, shows the inevitable trend of poetic modernity in urban writings; on the other hand, it also manifests the desire of Chinese poets in search of a discourse that embraces both Western and Chinese culture by focusing on their shared fate under the grand sociohistorical background of World War II.
  • Book Reviews
  • Reviewed by Aragorn Quinn
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 99-102.
  • Reviewed by Ruselle Meade
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 103-108.
  • Reviewed by Huiwen Shi
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 109-114.
  • Reviewed by Hong Jiang
    Journal of Translation Studies. 2017, 1(2): 115-118.